Bflobill69
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 6
|
 |
« on: May 16, 2012, 05:36:55 PM » |
|
After long debate and consideration I have decided to ADD a snubby to my arsenal. Have not decided WHAT yet. The purpose of this gun will be to carry concealed here in Northcentral Arizona. Some serious questions remain for me though: 1) 5 or 6 shot? 2) J frame (or d frame colt) or K/L frame? 3) If a S&W do I get a new one with the "Hillary Hole" or look for an older one? What are the drawbacks to having the internal lock? 4) Do I need a .357 or will a .38 +P gun be sufficient? 5) Who makes the "best" IWB holsters for snubbies? 6) What self defense ammo has the best track record for 2-3" snubbies? I own several 4" and 6" S&W K frames, and shoot them rather well, yet I am drawn to the J frame that could be carried "in pocket". So, I defer to you guys, who I am sure can give me greater insight into what I should do. Thankyou in advance for your suggestions.
Keep your aim straight and your powder dry,
Bflobill in the Wild West
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 05:39:51 PM by Bflobill69 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
 |
« on: May 16, 2012, 05:36:55 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Jed
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 253
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2012, 02:38:21 PM » |
|
Bflobill,
I personally prefer the S&W airweight j-frames, particularly the 638 and 642. They are light enough to pocket carry or carry in an ankle holster or IWB comfortably, but not so light that the recoil of the +P rounds beat me up too bad. These are my "always" guns. I almost always have something larger on me as well, but I am never without a j-frame anywhere I'm legal to carry. It's the first thing that goes in a pocket when I start the day, and the last thing that leaves my pocket at the end of the day.
I have some experience with a d frame Colt and that was a very fine revolver as well. It shot well and I loved having 6 cartridges, but it wasn't rated for +p and that ended up being a deal killer for me. I'd rather have 5 +p rounds than 6 non-+p.
Both of S&W's have the lock hole, and I've not had any problems with it, but I know others have in different S&W revolvers. I hear that the ultra lightweight S&W's with heavy recoil (e.g., the 329) have caused the locks to seize the cylinder shut. I'd prefer not to have the lock on mine, but I am willing to tolerate it because for me these are the best balance of control, size, and weight for a pocket revolver. I might one day remove the lock, but haven't done so yet.
While I'm usually a "less is never more" sort of guy, in this pocket role, I think 38 +p is as big as I'm willing to go. Anything more and recoil becomes a big issue. I use the Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +p rounds in mine, which I understand have a very good track record with snubbies used by NYPD.
In this pocket role, you'll probably want to avoid any exposed hammers, which can catch on the drawstroke. That's why I went with the shrouded hammer in the 638 and the enclosed hammer in the 642. As between the two, I like the very smooth trigger on my 638 a little better than the trigger on the 642.
The other thing about pocket carry is that the drawstroke is a lot slower than a belt holster, if you start with your hands outside the pocket. However, I think it's as fast, or faster, than a belt holster if you start with your hand in your pocket. Whenever a situation feels remotely weird, it's a non-threatening gesture to simply put your hand in the pocket and on the grip, ready to go if necessary, ready to let go if not.
You'll want to use a pocket holster. Don't let your revolver sit in your pocket without one. I personally like the pocket holsters from Pocket Concealment Systems. They hold up nicely to years of daily pocket carry, and do a good job of breaking up the outline of the revolver.
Good luck in your search. Hope you find something that works for you.
TN Jed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Tennessee Jed ---- Ordinary guy.
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2012, 02:38:21 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
Supporter
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 349
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2012, 03:11:44 PM » |
|
I agree on every angle TN Jed just pointed out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“If frogs had side pockets, they'd carry hand guns.” ― Dan Rather
|
|
|
Tennessee Jed
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 253
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2012, 09:20:27 PM » |
|
Lawrence, based on some of your other posts, I would bet you and I probably have similar tastes in handguns.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Tennessee Jed ---- Ordinary guy.
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2012, 09:20:27 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
Supporter
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 349
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2012, 10:50:35 PM » |
|
Lawrence, based on some of your other posts, I would bet you and I probably have similar tastes in handguns.
Agreed my friend. And when it comes to J-frames I can assure you we come really close. The one with the shrouded hammer is growing on me since you mentioned the lighter trigger.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“If frogs had side pockets, they'd carry hand guns.” ― Dan Rather
|
|
|
Bflobill69
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 6
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2012, 02:34:27 AM » |
|
Greatly appreciate all the input. After very careful consideration I have decided the S&W Model 642 is the best choice for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Jed
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 253
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2012, 09:38:32 AM » |
|
Great choice! When you get it, I suggest you consider how you anticipate reloading it, and make sure the grips will work with your chosen method. For example, I normally carry HKS speedloaders, but the S&W rubber grips got in the way. A $20 Hogue bantam grip fixed the problem for me.
Then go buy a ton of ammo and go shoot it, shoot it some more, and then shoot some more after that. At first, I found it difficult to hit accurately with a j-frame, but a lot of practice will solve that problem quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Tennessee Jed ---- Ordinary guy.
|
|
|
|