|
Bob Mayne
|
 |
« on: July 03, 2012, 11:06:47 PM » |
|
Awesome video! A must watch. <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/6W4_mgATjHQ&rel=0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/6W4_mgATjHQ&rel=0</a>]]> |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« on: July 03, 2012, 11:06:47 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
Supporter
Sr. Member
 Offline
Posts: 349
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2012, 11:31:39 PM » |
|
 Great idea. I'm about to get a G19 Gen3 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“If frogs had side pockets, they'd carry hand guns.”
― Dan Rather
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2012, 11:31:39 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Mayne
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2012, 08:43:41 AM » |
|
Get a Gen 4. They're good to go now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
andrsnsm
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2012, 09:04:55 AM » |
|
Either way, you won't have to pay a tax for not buying one :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2012, 09:04:55 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
moreshooting
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2012, 09:43:22 AM » |
|
Bob, Thanks for the great video. I posted it on Facebook and Twitter too. There is a lot of validity to that idea of taxing people who do not take care of their own personal defense. In Texas ( the great gun friendly state you live in) additional insurance is required if you wish to ride a motorcycle without a helmet. The justification is that if you have an accident without one you are more likely to become a burden on the state if you don't have the insurance. Likewise. If I'm not willing to take responsibility for my own personal defense am I not more likely to become a burden on the state? I think the government should give use a discount if we choose to arm ourselves to reduce the burden on and increase the efficiency of law enforcement or tax those who choose not to protect themselves and their loved ones. I know something like this would never gain a foothold, but it's nice to dream... Thanks Jeff Sinason http://www.moreshooting.com |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
Supporter
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 349
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2012, 02:25:25 PM » |
|
Get a Gen 4. They're good to go now.
I just came back from the range and did have the chance to shoot the G19 Gen4 and tell you what ... I liked a lot. I was hit by a shell case once and thought my friends gun must be one of first ones out when they released. It didn't bother me at all and am going to sell some stuff in order to raise the money for the G19. I also shot the Shield in 40 cal and am very impressed. Mild recoil and dead on sights. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“If frogs had side pockets, they'd carry hand guns.”
― Dan Rather
|
|
|
sdprof
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2012, 06:06:40 PM » |
|
So, if I choose to buy an XD, I'm going to have to pay the tax?  I had the same idea, about the same time that was posted. My comment on another forum: Let's push for the Citizens' Protection and Violence Reduction Act of 2013.
It shall require every legal resident over the age of 18, who is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm, to own a gun of at least .38 caliber in pistol or .223 in rifle or a shotgun, and sufficient ammunition to train and defend him or herself. Anyone failing to be so equipped within one year of enactment will be subject to a $1000 tax, annually, until so equipped.
SCOTUS said it's OK to tax into compliance. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 04, 2012, 11:30:48 PM by sdprof, Reason: spelling »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SirBrass
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1189
Pretty Cunning, don'tcha think?
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2012, 11:31:19 AM » |
|
Does that mean I get a tax discount which cancels out the obamacare penalties if I own multiple sufficiently powerful handguns? PLEAAAAASE  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
~James Robertson (call me Jamie)
"The truth is that until 1920, Britain's gun laws were so relaxed they made Texas look effeminate, but we had virtually no gun crime. That only really began to increase here after we abolished hanging." ~ Peter Hitchens
"Close only counts in 3 three things: horseshoes, hand grenades, and strategic nuclear weapons." ~ Anonymous
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2012, 11:31:19 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Mayne
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2012, 12:22:23 PM » |
|
If that were true, I would probably get a real nice tax credit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SirBrass
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1189
Pretty Cunning, don'tcha think?
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2012, 12:48:28 PM » |
|
If that were true, I would probably get a real nice tax credit.
The government owes me backpay for helping keep my neighbors MORE safe by me being well armed.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
~James Robertson (call me Jamie)
"The truth is that until 1920, Britain's gun laws were so relaxed they made Texas look effeminate, but we had virtually no gun crime. That only really began to increase here after we abolished hanging." ~ Peter Hitchens
"Close only counts in 3 three things: horseshoes, hand grenades, and strategic nuclear weapons." ~ Anonymous
|
|
|
Charlie Foxtrot
Supporter
Hero Member
 Online
Posts: 1896
Laugh at the Bastards!!!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2012, 02:31:23 PM » |
|
Oh, please gawd, no.
That would arm my lazy, uneducated, government unionized, 105% COLA'd pensioned, community organizing, Democrat, Obama lubbin' brother-in-law.
He began life as a negligent discharge, and I don't expect him to change.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 05, 2012, 04:14:09 PM by Charlie Foxtrot »
|
Logged
|
"We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men. Nor from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular."
-- Edward R. Murrow
Carpe Jugulum Seize the Throat
GRRN Subscriber and Supporter
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2012, 02:31:23 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
moreshooting
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2012, 03:11:28 PM » |
|
a retro-active tax credit. I like that even better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GRRN Forums
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2012, 03:11:28 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Mayne
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2012, 08:35:17 AM » |
|
He began life as a negligent discharge, and I don't expect him to change.
Now that's funny!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SirBrass
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1189
Pretty Cunning, don'tcha think?
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2012, 11:04:34 AM » |
|
Oh, please gawd, no.
That would arm my lazy, uneducated, government unionized, 105% COLA'd pensioned, community organizing, Democrat, Obama lubbin' brother-in-law.
He began life as a negligent discharge, and I don't expect him to change.
See, Dev, this is why knowing someone can be a dangerous thing (cross over from "The quitter" thread): negligent discharges |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
~James Robertson (call me Jamie)
"The truth is that until 1920, Britain's gun laws were so relaxed they made Texas look effeminate, but we had virtually no gun crime. That only really began to increase here after we abolished hanging." ~ Peter Hitchens
"Close only counts in 3 three things: horseshoes, hand grenades, and strategic nuclear weapons." ~ Anonymous
|
|
|
|
